Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: Direction in a community of ethical inquiry

Download

A- A+
Alt. Display

Research

Direction in a community of ethical inquiry

Author:

Tim Sprod

Association for Philosophy in Tasmanian Schools, AU
X close

Abstract

In response to Hand’s paper, I undertake three tasks. Firstly, I believe that his characterisation of the theory and practice of Community of Inquiry facilitation does not take account of approaches to indoctrination and the idea of philosophical self-effacement that can lessen his worries. Secondly, I will argue that Hand makes some sharp cuts—particularly between justified, controversial and unjustified moral standards—that do not stand up to scrutiny, and that he unnecessarily narrows the scope of moral inquiry. Finally, I will explore the practicalities of these considerations. How should we approach the idea of directive teaching in training facilitators? What should moral inquiry cover? In doing so, I see much of value in Hand’s approach, but also recommend some modifications.

How to Cite: Sprod, T., 2020. Direction in a community of ethical inquiry. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 7(2). DOI: http://doi.org/10.46707/jps.v7ii.122
49
Views
54
Downloads
6
Twitter
Published on 18 Dec 2020.
Peer Reviewed

Downloads

  • PDF (EN)

    comments powered by Disqus